Thanks.
Should I draw a profile, it would be without the white area that seems a fake. Other images of planes of the same unit would be needed. Besides I am not convinced about the lack of the mast, there is something in the photo that could be a pole on the background, but has a suspicious resemblance to an out of standard mast, or a mast casually overposed to a pole on the background.
Regards
Massimo
Yes to the profile.
I think both images were shot at the same place and at the same time. There is a pole in both shots,the photographer changed angles and in the touched up photo it looks like two trees. Also the camo netting i think is in the new photo? However your barley seeing the outer rope edge.
I think I can explain the lack of the antenna mast.
The canopy looks to be broken inside the blue circle it looks to have a jagged edge there. This could explain the lack of a mast it may have been sheared off?
Also #42 has no mast in the image also?