Massimo Tessitori
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2017, 08:29:28 AM » |
|
Hi Misos, the stars on the fuselage had a bad perspectical deformation, the brace of the star should appear with concave sides. The canopy looks too dark. Regards Massimo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johann
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2017, 08:47:22 AM » |
|
Hi Misos, is there any certainty that the pattern on different planes was so different? For RKKA this is not very typical
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2017, 11:04:30 AM » |
|
Hi Gents, thank you for comments. Massimo, I will check those braces of the stars. And yes, cockpit is too dark. I will make it a bit lighter, but it is intentionally so dark. I do not want to show (e.g. spend much time) with interior. Johann, all profiles are made according to the photos, not according to the other profiles. And photos show such differences. I know there were NKAP schemes in 1941 and 1943, but seems that guys around Yaks were a bit more creative. Regards, 66misos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2017, 07:04:43 PM » |
|
Hi Massimo, you are right about that star. Now I believe without any objections ;-) My son made me a visualization in the 3D modelling software and here is render: It is clear now and forever. Regards, 66misos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johann
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2017, 07:42:03 PM » |
|
Johann, all profiles are made according to the photos, not according to the other profiles. And photos show such differences. I know there were NKAP schemes in 1941 and 1943, but seems that guys around Yaks were a bit more creative. Regards, 66misos
No, I'm not talking about the design of camouflage, I had clear boundaries about clear boundaries. In the photographs on both wings, the boundaries of the flowers and the angular pattern are quite clear.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2017, 08:02:49 AM » |
|
Hi, here is finished the view from the top: and here is original photo: Johann, (at least to me) it looks like that the plane is weathered and colors are bleached hard matt, while engine cover is darker and glossy - it is either repainted or dirty and greasy due to regular manipulation. Left wing looks to me at least partially repainted - it looks darker and borders of camouflage colors more sharp and straight than on the rest of the plane. Regards, 66misos
|
|
« Last Edit: December 23, 2017, 04:49:57 PM by 66misos »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johann
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2017, 09:05:43 AM » |
|
Yes, but on the right wing they are also straight and sharp, as well as on the left.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2017, 03:33:23 PM » |
|
Hi Johann, thank you for comment and very nice photo. Yes, it clearly shows quite sharp borders on AMT-12 field close to the fuselage, while AMT-12 close to the wing tip is fuzzy. And AMT-11 on the wing is significantly lighter then AMT-11 on the front fuselage. EDIT: Top view is already reworked and picture replaced.. Regards, 66misos
|
|
« Last Edit: December 23, 2017, 04:48:42 PM by 66misos »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Massimo Tessitori
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2017, 05:35:27 PM » |
|
Hi Misos, it is a luck to have a son able to make 3D drawings. Regards Massimo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 26, 2017, 09:10:03 AM » |
|
Hi, here is the bottom view on the Yak-9D: Regards, 66misos
|
|
« Last Edit: December 28, 2017, 06:10:05 PM by 66misos »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Massimo Tessitori
|
|
« Reply #25 on: December 26, 2017, 11:22:21 AM » |
|
Hi Misos, it looks fine, apart for the lack of the exhaust stacks. Regards Massimo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #26 on: December 26, 2017, 03:56:35 PM » |
|
Hi Massimo, thank you for comment. I forgot them hidden. I corrected it, the picture is already replaced in my post above. regards, 66misos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Massimo Tessitori
|
|
« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2017, 05:34:05 PM » |
|
Hi Misos, I see that the blue on the rear of the fuselage is much darker than on other surfaces. Regards Massimo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
66misos
|
|
« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2017, 06:40:56 PM » |
|
Hi Massimo, it is intentionally- it is shadow and dirty, same as in previous bottom views. Here I probably by mistake changed some value of that shadow layer. I will check it. Thank you. 66misos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Massimo Tessitori
|
|
« Reply #29 on: December 26, 2017, 07:24:37 PM » |
|
Hi Misos, the part behind the flap of the oil cooler should be on shadow. Besides it could be dirty. Regards Massimo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|