Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /membri/massimotessitori/sovietwarplanes/board/Sources/Load.php(225) : runtime-created function on line 3

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /membri/massimotessitori/sovietwarplanes/board/Sources/Load.php(225) : runtime-created function on line 3
Print Page - Spitfire Vb 57 GvIAP, Kuban, new photo to me.

Sovietwarplanes

Great Patriotic War Aviation => Lend-lease planes => Topic started by: Troy Smith on May 01, 2020, 04:24:46 AM



Title: Spitfire Vb 57 GvIAP, Kuban, new photo to me.
Post by: Troy Smith on May 01, 2020, 04:24:46 AM

while seaching ava.org.ru, I have tried using google and added in the Cyrillic for Spitfire "Спитфайр"  and Hurricane "Харрикейн"

from http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g.htm (http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g.htm)

this image is well know, and there has been debate over the lightning flash,  being reported as yellow,  as seen here
(http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g/spitfire-5b_ep210_538_prof.png)

 and then being cleaned off.
(http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g/spit5b.jpg)

but also in the link is this, which is new too me

(http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g/spitfire_en311_529.jpg)

Spitfire  529, which is interesting as it shows another plane in the unit, from the other side, with position and style of the board number (very similar) and a not removed lightning flash.
Now, could vaguely make out the start of the serial, 'E'  so I opened the image in a new tab and tried enlarging ...and then noticed the image name
http://ava.org.ru/iap/57g/spitfire_en311_529.jpg   

the EN311 is the interesting bit, now from the Spitfire production site EN311 is a Mk.IX, but EP311 is a Mk.Vb, sent to USSR

http://www.airhistory.org.uk/spitfire/p038.html (http://www.airhistory.org.uk/spitfire/p038.html)

Quote
EP311   Vb CBAF M46 33MU 20-6-42 82MU 6-7-42 Canada 3-12-42 USSR 1-3-43

I presume there is a note in unit records of the board number/serial tie up?  I shall contact PG Monster and ask, but always a treat when a new photo surfaces. 

see also
https://lend-lease.net/articles-en/spitfires-over-the-kuban/ (https://lend-lease.net/articles-en/spitfires-over-the-kuban/)

Quote
It was in this time frame that the regiment’s distinguishing symbol, a depiction of the Guards badge, began to appear on the horizontal stabilizers of the Russified Spitfires. The other distinguishing mark of the regiment was a yellow lightning bolt down the entire side of the fuselage, which began to appear when the regiment was still fighting in I-16s. The lightning bolt also appeared on the regiment’s aircraft later when it began to fight in the American P-39, and survived on several airframes of one version when later they were handed over to a PVO (protivo-vozdushnaya oborona—air defense) regiment.

the entire article is well worth a read.


Title: Re: Spitfire Vb 57 GvIAP, Kuban, new photo to me.
Post by: PG monster on May 05, 2020, 01:37:08 PM
Hi,
I preserved that filename sent by M.Bykov guru. Surely, if I'll ask him about the number he will answer as always "it was long time ago in faraway galactica, so I don't remember".
Sorry.


Title: Re: Spitfire Vb 57 GvIAP, Kuban, new photo to me.
Post by: Troy Smith on May 29, 2020, 01:15:37 AM
On one of my many searches,  this turned up
http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/spitfire.php (http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/spitfire.php)

Quote
"1/72 Airfix Spitfire Vb representing EN911 of 57 GIAP, Kuban' area, spring 1943  (http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/ModelGallery/Ruchkovsky/Spitfire/SpitMkV_W529_5.jpg)


while not exactly stunning evidence, that this quotes EN911 ,  and,
http://www.airhistory.org.uk/spitfire/p037.html (http://www.airhistory.org.uk/spitfire/p037.html)
Quote
EN911   Vb CBAF   M46   38MU 3-6-42 76MU 4-7-42 City of Derby 1-11-42 USSR 10-1-43

Thought worth a mention.  Modeller does not state his source, and the other Spitfire model looks, not very believable.   


Title: Re: Spitfire Vb 57 GvIAP, Kuban, new photo to me.
Post by: Massimo Tessitori on May 29, 2020, 01:24:22 PM
Do you need to ask  Ruckovsky? I'm in contact with him. I suppose that this type of informations is from Ilya Grinberg.
Regards
Massimo