Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /membri/massimotessitori/sovietwarplanes/board/Sources/Load.php(225) : runtime-created function on line 3
Updates to the LaGG-3 page
Sovietwarplanes
May 30, 2024, 06:28:05 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum replaces the old sovietwarplanes.com whose domain has expired in January 2017. It has been updated with the posts of the year 2016.
The new location of the site 'Sovietwarplanes pages' is at http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/pages/
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Updates to the LaGG-3 page  (Read 17762 times)
PG monster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 340


« Reply #30 on: June 17, 2021, 10:34:28 AM »

http://ava.org.ru/iap/9m.htm
2 additional photos of LaGG-3 of А.А.Gerasimov shows some details.
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #31 on: June 17, 2021, 02:13:23 PM »

Hi, interesting.


Excellent.


This looks a Yak.


Uncertain on this.

Regards
Massimo
Logged
Graham Boak
Full Member
***
Posts: 138


« Reply #32 on: June 18, 2021, 11:09:20 AM »

The middle photo has the shaped nose above the intake typical of the LaGG and unlike the Yak.  The canopy matches that in the LaGG in the link above.

The lowest photo lacks the protruding starter pick-up, which may be a feature of a later batch?  The rivet pattern on the cowling appears to be the same as the a/c above, but the wing root intake may be a hint for someone better informed than me.
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #33 on: June 18, 2021, 04:44:47 PM »

I see that the plane of the middle photo has panels on the side of the cockpit, a LaGG-3 should be smooth on that area. The straight shape of the rear of landing gear bays seem of a Yak-1, as the exhaust pipes protruding from individual openings of the cowlings. The outlet of the cooler looks of a Yak too.

The last photo has the wheel door as on Yak 7/9.
Logged
John Thompson
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1696



« Reply #34 on: June 18, 2021, 04:57:37 PM »

The middle photo has the shaped nose above the intake typical of the LaGG and unlike the Yak.  The canopy matches that in the LaGG in the link above.

The lowest photo lacks the protruding starter pick-up, which may be a feature of a later batch?  The rivet pattern on the cowling appears to be the same as the a/c above, but the wing root intake may be a hint for someone better informed than me.

The first and second photos show a rectangular windscreen, so if they are LaGG-3s, they can only be series 66. The second photo shows a landing gear well shape unlike the LaGG-3 - the shape visible in the photo, plus the lack of the exhaust shroud that would be present on a typical LaGG-3/66, suggests to me that it's a Yak-1, maybe an early Yak-1B.

The aircraft in the third photo is a Yak-9, perhaps a Yak-7, but not a LaGG - the shape of the wing root intake and the presence of the main landing gear inner door (not present on LaGG-3) are key details.

John

Oops - you beat me to it, Massimo!  Cheesy
« Last Edit: June 18, 2021, 05:24:42 PM by John Thompson » Logged
Ohotnyik
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 94


« Reply #35 on: June 18, 2021, 09:40:13 PM »

The upper picture is LaGG-3 tip 66.
The middle one is JAK-1, see the shape of of the landing gear bay, the exhausts...
The lower picture is also JAK (7-9) see the injection slot and the landing gear cover.
Logged
Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 235



WWW
« Reply #36 on: December 01, 2021, 09:52:35 PM »

Maybe someone will come in handy. This is from my personal photo archive.






« Last Edit: December 01, 2021, 09:54:15 PM by Johann » Logged
Psy06
Full Member
***
Posts: 140


« Reply #37 on: December 01, 2021, 10:01:56 PM »

I-301 - 2?
Logged
Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 235



WWW
« Reply #38 on: December 01, 2021, 10:05:58 PM »

yes
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #39 on: December 01, 2021, 11:08:26 PM »

Hi, beautiful photos, thank you.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 235



WWW
« Reply #40 on: December 02, 2021, 05:07:08 AM »

I have more, but they need to be scanned.
Logged
Graham Boak
Full Member
***
Posts: 138


« Reply #41 on: December 02, 2021, 04:15:44 PM »

Are these two separate incidents?  Despite the similarities, the gun openings for the forward gun are significantly different in length, and the small intake near the bottom of the cowling also differs.  There are different wear marks on the fuselage, different exhaust stains, and different appearance of certain panels, though the last could be explained by the two photos taken at different times and light conditions.
Logged
Psy06
Full Member
***
Posts: 140


« Reply #42 on: December 02, 2021, 04:50:03 PM »

Are these two separate incidents?  Despite the similarities, the gun openings for the forward gun are significantly different in length, and the small intake near the bottom of the cowling also differs.  There are different wear marks on the fuselage, different exhaust stains, and different appearance of certain panels, though the last could be explained by the two photos taken at different times and light conditions.

Yes, on one it is unarmed
Logged
warhawk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 401



« Reply #43 on: December 02, 2021, 07:11:33 PM »

Very interesting and high quality.
Thanks for sharing!
Logged
Anton Petrov
Newbie
*
Posts: 46


WWW
« Reply #44 on: December 18, 2021, 07:06:23 AM »

Quote
Maybe someone will come in handy. This is from my personal photo archive

Excellent photos,  thanks lots for sharing!:)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!