Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /membri/massimotessitori/sovietwarplanes/board/Sources/Load.php(225) : runtime-created function on line 3
Yakovlev Yak-1 & Yak-1b profiles
Sovietwarplanes
October 15, 2024, 06:33:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum replaces the old sovietwarplanes.com whose domain has expired in January 2017. It has been updated with the posts of the year 2016.
The new location of the site 'Sovietwarplanes pages' is at http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/pages/
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
  Print  
Author Topic: Yakovlev Yak-1 & Yak-1b profiles  (Read 39030 times)
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #75 on: August 22, 2021, 12:07:40 PM »

Hi Misos,
I've uploaded  the pages at:

http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/pages/yak1/Misos/yak1b-unknown/yak1b-unknown.htm

http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/pages/yak9/misos/stepanenko9T/stepanenko9T.htm

I have added (related to Pokrovskij) in the too anonymous title because even if it wasn't his plane, the photo created the legend that it was.

A surprising thing of this plane is that its tail is fully of victory stars. So if it wasn't his plane, it could have been of another ace... or a complete propaganda fake.
 
Best regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #76 on: August 22, 2021, 01:59:16 PM »

Hi Massimo,

thank you for posting. Adding "(related to Pokrovskij)" was a good idea. We will see if any new info arise. As one said - the truth is out there.

Regards,
    66misos
Logged

66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #77 on: September 04, 2021, 03:03:37 PM »

Hi,
I have started work on another Yak-1b. Now it is plane from the 1st Fighting Regiment "City of Warshaw" (1 PLM "Warszawa") from autumn 1943.



This plane already wore standard grey-grey camouflage with the combination of the old and new red stars.
- July 3, 1943 - directive no.2389/0133 - the upper and side surfaces of all fighter aircraft have to be painted in greyish blue and dark grey colors.
- September 3, 1943 - No.267 issued - red stars have to have outline with white line 5cm wide edged with red line 1cm wide.

Here is my work in progress:


Regards,
   66misos
Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #78 on: September 04, 2021, 05:01:57 PM »

Hi Misos,
this will be welcome. I wait to see its evolution up to the definitive version.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #79 on: September 05, 2021, 07:13:23 AM »

Hi Misos,
a thing that this photo of Yak, and some other ones, seem to show is that the lower part of the rear of the fuselage seems painted with AMT-11, while the wings and metallic parts seem painted in light blue. I wonder if it was a matter of availabilty of paints.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #80 on: September 05, 2021, 10:50:03 AM »

Hi Massimo,
exactly, the lower part of the rear fuselage confuses me, it is quite dark, almost zero contrast against AMT-11.
At britmodeller forum is an article Yakovlev Yak-1b 1st Fighter Regiment "City of Warsaw" with several photos, here showing Yak-1b from 1945:


Repainting with paints of the color not exactly matching original camouflage was not unusual.

Photo of White II from Arma Hobby blog in a bit better photo:


And the photo of the same plane from Як-1 с двигателем М-105ПФ


So if original camouflage of White II looked similar to White 12 (light blue AMt-7 going high at the rear fuselage), then it could be overpainted with some darker "local mixture", may be mix of light blue and black or AMT-11 of the different shade, to make sides of the fuselage darker.

Regards,
   66misos
« Last Edit: September 05, 2021, 11:00:37 AM by 66misos » Logged

66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #81 on: September 05, 2021, 12:48:23 PM »

Hi,
so far basic camouflage and some smoke stains.



Regards,
   66misos
Logged

John Thompson
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1696



« Reply #82 on: September 05, 2021, 02:04:44 PM »

The carburetor air intake in the wing root appears much larger than on standard Yak-1Bs. The photo of "White 12" (shown Photoshopped into "White 13" in the Britmodeller thread) shows this; there's another photo of this aircraft published on the back cover of Skrzydla w Miniaturze 2/91 showing the intake from the front quarter which confirms the larger size. Was this a common modification on Polish Yaks? Was it just one aircraft?

John
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #83 on: September 05, 2021, 04:54:56 PM »

Hi Misos,
from the photo, I see that the AMT-11 (or what is) look extended to the lower part of the rear fuselage, including the tail wheel doors and the cooling fairing. I remember a similar photo that I  wasn't able to find in my hard disk with the rear surfaces dark and light blue under the wing and nose. I suppose that it was a matter of stocks of paint, that is that the factory was short of AMT-7 and used the closest shades available.
Best regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #84 on: September 05, 2021, 07:12:54 PM »

Hi Massimo,
you are right. I made some corrections, plus I added "weathering" and "dirting", so here is the final result:

EDIT Septt 11, 2021 - old picture replaced by this corrected one:


Regards,
   66misos
« Last Edit: September 11, 2021, 10:23:58 AM by 66misos » Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #85 on: September 05, 2021, 08:12:26 PM »

Hi Misos,
the conformation of the exhaust stacks should be different, they have plates up and down. I would make the mast a bit bended forward.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
Graham Boak
Full Member
***
Posts: 138


« Reply #86 on: September 05, 2021, 10:54:41 PM »

Darker paint or just stains from the airflow out of the radiator?
Logged
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6530


« Reply #87 on: September 06, 2021, 06:49:45 AM »

I don't think, it shouldn't have been so uniform on the sides.
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1598

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #88 on: September 11, 2021, 10:27:18 AM »

Hi,
I replaced original picture with corrected one:
- antenna mast in vertical position,
- added plates above and below exhaust stacks,
- hole at the front fuselage deleted.

Regards,
  66misos
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!