Sovietwarplanes
July 18, 2019, 09:22:54 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: This forum replaces the old sovietwarplanes.com whose domain has expired in January 2017. It has been updated with the posts of the year 2016.
The new location of the site 'Sovietwarplanes pages' is at http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/pages/
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Yakovlev Yak-9xx profiles  (Read 6478 times)
Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5740


« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2017, 08:29:28 AM »

Hi Misos, the stars on the fuselage had a bad perspectical deformation, the brace of the star should appear with concave sides.
The canopy looks too dark.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 216



WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2017, 08:47:22 AM »

Hi Misos, is there any certainty that the pattern on different planes was so different? For RKKA this is not very typical
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2017, 11:04:30 AM »

Hi Gents,
thank you for comments.
Massimo, I will check those braces of the stars. And yes, cockpit is too dark. I will make it a bit lighter, but it is intentionally so dark. I do not want to show (e.g. spend much time) with interior.
Johann, all profiles are made according to the photos, not according to the other profiles. And photos show such differences. I know there were NKAP schemes in 1941 and 1943, but seems that guys around Yaks were a bit more creative.
Regards,
   66misos
Logged

66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2017, 07:04:43 PM »

Hi Massimo,
you are right about that star. Now I believe without any objections ;-)
My son made me a visualization in the 3D modelling software and here is render:

It is clear now and forever.
Regards,
   66misos
Logged

Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 216



WWW
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2017, 07:42:03 PM »

Johann, all profiles are made according to the photos, not according to the other profiles. And photos show such differences. I know there were NKAP schemes in 1941 and 1943, but seems that guys around Yaks were a bit more creative.
Regards,
   66misos

No, I'm not talking about the design of camouflage, I had clear boundaries about clear boundaries. In the photographs on both wings, the boundaries of the flowers and the angular pattern are quite clear.
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2017, 08:02:49 AM »

Hi,
here is finished the view from the top:


and here is original photo:


Johann, (at least to me) it looks like that the plane is weathered and colors are bleached hard matt, while engine cover is darker and glossy - it is either repainted or dirty and greasy due to regular manipulation. Left wing looks to me at least partially repainted - it looks darker and borders of camouflage colors more sharp and straight than on the rest of the plane.
Regards,
   66misos
« Last Edit: December 23, 2017, 04:49:57 PM by 66misos » Logged

Johann
Full Member
***
Posts: 216



WWW
« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2017, 09:05:43 AM »

Yes, but on the right wing they are also straight and sharp, as well as on the left.
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2017, 03:33:23 PM »

Hi Johann,
thank you for comment and very nice photo. Yes, it clearly shows quite sharp borders on AMT-12 field close to the fuselage, while AMT-12 close to the wing tip is fuzzy. And AMT-11 on the wing is significantly lighter then AMT-11 on the front fuselage.
EDIT: Top view is already reworked and picture replaced..
Regards,
   66misos
« Last Edit: December 23, 2017, 04:48:42 PM by 66misos » Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5740


« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2017, 05:35:27 PM »

Hi Misos,
it is a luck to have a son able to make 3D drawings.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #24 on: December 26, 2017, 09:10:03 AM »

Hi,
here is the bottom view on the Yak-9D:

Regards,
   66misos
« Last Edit: December 28, 2017, 06:10:05 PM by 66misos » Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5740


« Reply #25 on: December 26, 2017, 11:22:21 AM »

Hi Misos,
it looks fine, apart for the lack of the exhaust stacks.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #26 on: December 26, 2017, 03:56:35 PM »

Hi Massimo,
thank you for comment. I forgot them hidden. Sad
I corrected it, the picture is already replaced in my post above.
regards,
   66misos
Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5740


« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2017, 05:34:05 PM »

Hi Misos,
I see that the blue on the rear of the fuselage is much darker than on other surfaces.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1482

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2017, 06:40:56 PM »

Hi Massimo,
it is intentionally- it is shadow and dirty, same as in previous bottom views. Here I probably by mistake changed some value of that shadow layer. I will check it.
Thank you.
   66misos
Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5740


« Reply #29 on: December 26, 2017, 07:24:37 PM »

Hi Misos,
the part behind the flap of the oil cooler should be on shadow. Besides it could be dirty.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!